Escalante v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided August 26, 2022·No. 6:20-cv-00719·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON LISA D. ESCALANTE, Case No. 6:20-cv-00719-YY Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY vs. FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA COMMISSIONER, Social Security Administration, Defendant. Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, it is ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $7,750.00 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010), if the Commissioner confirms that Plaintiff owes no debt to the Government through the federal treasury offset program, payment of this award shall be made by check made payable and mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel, Mark A. Manning, WELLS, MANNING, EITENMILLER & TAYLOR, P.C., 474 Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401. If Plaintiff has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel’s address provided above. There are no costs or expenses to be paid herein. Dated this __2_6_th_ day of __A_u_g_u_s_t_____ 2022.

___/_s_/ _Y_o_u_l_ee_ _Y_i_m_ _Y_o_u_ ____________________ YOULEE YIM YOU United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Escalante v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2022).

Escalante v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Escalante v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)