Esbenshade v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Esbenshade v. State

494 So. 2d 274, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2010, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9725

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 17, 1986

DocketNo. 85-2838

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 494 So. 2d 274 (Esbenshade v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Esbenshade v. State, 494 So. 2d 274, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2010, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9725 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the order revoking his probation.

There was sufficient evidence to justify the revocation of probation, and the trial court’s oral pronouncements to that effect were not erroneous. However, the order erroneously fails to recite the conditions of probation which were violated. See Meyer v. State, 445 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Dunlap v. State, 405 So.2d 796 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Accordingly, we remand for correction of the order but otherwise affirm.

RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI