Esbenshade v. State
494 So. 2d 274, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2010, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9725
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 17, 1986·No. No. 85-2838·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Defendant appeals the order revoking his probation.
There was sufficient evidence to justify the revocation of probation, and the trial court’s oral pronouncements to that effect were not erroneous. However, the order erroneously fails to recite the conditions of probation which were violated. See Meyer v. State, 445 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Dunlap v. State, 405 So.2d 796 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).
Accordingly, we remand for correction of the order but otherwise affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Esbenshade v. State, 494 So. 2d 274, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2010, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9725 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
494 So. 2d 274 (Esbenshade v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas v. State
585 So. 2d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Chaplin v. State
501 So. 2d 728 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Savage v. State
494 So. 2d 274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)