Esaia Kemuel Morris v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-19-00085-CR
Esaia Kemuel Morris, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-16-0350, THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T
PER CURIAM
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by
a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he
provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine
the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for
pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with
this Court.
Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial
court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was
provided, on or before November 14, 2019. See id. at 321.
It is ordered on November 4, 2019.
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Triana and Smith
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Esaia Kemuel Morris v. State (Esaia Kemuel Morris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.