Erzinger v. Lieberman

218 A.D. 847
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1926·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order striking out defendants’ answer and granting summary judgment, and the judgment entered thereon, reversed on the law, with costs, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The averments of the affidavit in opposition to the motion, that plaintiff deprived the tenants of the use and occupation of four feet of the premises facing on Surf avenue, so that the tenants instead of having fifteen feet [848]*848on Surf avenue, as the lease provides, had only eleven feet thereon, show facts sufficient to entitle defendants to defend under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. This is so even if there is no defense or counterclaim pleaded in the answer. (Curry v. Mackenzie, 239 N. Y. 267.) Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erzinger v. Lieberman, 218 A.D. 847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

218 A.D. 847 (Erzinger v. Lieberman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marks v. Follo
177 Misc. 108 (New York Supreme Court, 1941)