Eryn O'Connor v. State
This text of Eryn O'Connor v. State (Eryn O'Connor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-06-010-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
_______________________________________________________
ERYN O=CONNOR, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 214th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yañez
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant seeks to appeal from an order imposing sanctions on defendant and continuing or modifying community supervision. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
In Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977), the Court held that a defendant may not appeal from an order continuing a defendant on probation with amended terms and conditions. There is neither constitutional nor statutory authority which would confer jurisdiction on this Court to hear an appeal from an order modifying probationary conditions. Basaldua, 558 S.W.2d at 5.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 26th day of January, 2006.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Eryn O'Connor v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eryn-oconnor-v-state-texapp-2006.