Erwin v. Vint

Supreme Court of Virginia

Erwin v. Vint

6 Va. 267

DecidedJanuary 18, 1819

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Va. 267 (Erwin v. Vint) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Erwin v. Vint, 6 Va. 267 (Va. 1819).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge Roane

pronounced the following opinion of the Court.

Under the circumstances of this case, and on the authority of the case of Kemp v. Squire, 1 Vezey Senr. 205, the Court is of opinion that the Decree ought to have been set aside, and the appellants permitted to file their answers, on payment of costs, in order to a trial of the [271]*271cause upon its merits. The decree appealed from is therefore reversed, with Costs, and the, cause remanded, to be proceeded in according to. the principles of this Decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge Roane

pronounced the following opinion of the Court.

Under the circumstances of this case, and on the authority of the case of Kemp v. Squire, 1 Vezey Senr. 205, the Court is of opinion that the Decree ought to have been set aside, and the appellants permitted to file their answers, on payment of costs, in order to a trial of the [271]*271cause upon its merits. The decree appealed from is therefore reversed, with Costs, and the, cause remanded, to be proceeded in according to. the principles of this Decree.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Va. 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erwin-v-vint-va-1819.