Erwin v. State

1937 OK CR 193, 74 P.2d 1173, 63 Okla. Crim. 315, 1937 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 184
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided December 23, 1937·No. No. A-9329.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted, in the district court of Jackson county, of burglary in the second degree, and his punishment fixed at two years in the state penitentiary.

This appeal must be dismissed for the reason that no notice of appeal was served on the clerk of the court and county attorney as required by section 3193, O. S. 1931, 22 Okla. St. Ann. § 1055, which section in part reads as follows:

“An appeal is taken by the service of a notice upon the clerk of the court where the judgment was entered, stating that the appellant appeals from the judgment. If taken by the defendant, a similar notice must be served upon the prosecuting attorney.”

A failure to serve a notice upon the clerk of the court and the prosecuting attorney is jurisdictional. Lutke v. State, 37 Okla. Cr. 18, 255 Pac. 719; Austin v. State, 55 Okla. Cr. 278, 28 Pac. 2d 1113.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erwin v. State, 1937 OK CR 193, 74 P.2d 1173, 63 Okla. Crim. 315, 1937 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 184 (Okla. Ct. App. 1937).

1937 OK CR 193 (Erwin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brittain v. State
1942 OK CR 56 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1942)
Thomison v. State
1942 OK CR 42 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1942)