Erwin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Erwin v. State

1931 OK CR 426, 3 P.2d 1117, 52 Okla. Crim. 119, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 436

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Erwin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Okla. Crim. 249 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided September 19, 1931·No. No. A-7806.·Published

Opinion

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to' as the defendant, was convicted of the crime of bank robbery with firearms, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years, and to pay the costs of this action, and appeals.

The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court April 10, 1930; no brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record discloses no fundamental errors, and the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

The case is therefore affirmed.

EDWARDS and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to' as the defendant, was convicted of the crime of bank robbery with firearms, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years, and to pay the costs of this action, and appeals.

The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court April 10, 1930; no brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record discloses no fundamental errors, and the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

The case is therefore affirmed.

EDWARDS and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Erwin v. State, 1931 OK CR 426, 3 P.2d 1117, 52 Okla. Crim. 119, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 436 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

1931 OK CR 426 (Erwin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.