Erwin v. State
This text of 108 So. 645 (Erwin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was indicted •on a charge of assault to murder. The jury returned a verdict convicting the defendant of an assault. Upon this verdict the court rendered a judgment as follows: “It is therefore considered and adjudged by the court that the defendant is guilty of assault to murder as charged in the indictment.” This was the judgment of the court, and is not supported by the verdict of the jury. Such judgment was error, and for this error must be reversed. Meadows v. State, ante, p. 72, 105 So. 428.
.. Let the judgment be reversed and the cause be remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 So. 645, 21 Ala. App. 376, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erwin-v-state-alactapp-1926.