Erwin v. State

108 So. 645, 21 Ala. App. 376, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 147
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 11, 1926·No. 7 Div. 168.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The defendant was indicted •on a charge of assault to murder. The jury returned a verdict convicting the defendant of an assault. Upon this verdict the court rendered a judgment as follows: “It is therefore considered and adjudged by the court that the defendant is guilty of assault to murder as charged in the indictment.” This was the judgment of the court, and is not supported by the verdict of the jury. Such judgment was error, and for this error must be reversed. Meadows v. State, ante, p. 72, 105 So. 428.

.. Let the judgment be reversed and the cause be remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erwin v. State, 108 So. 645, 21 Ala. App. 376, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 147 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

108 So. 645 (Erwin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sexton v. State
127 So. 497 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)
Stephens v. State
118 So. 231 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1928)