Erwin v. Martin

2 Wend. 250
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1829
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Wend. 250 (Erwin v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erwin v. Martin, 2 Wend. 250 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

Opinion

On a motion for retaxation of a bill of costs in this case, the court decided that where there are more than four witnesss subpoenaed, a party may charge for the engrossing and seal of as many more subpoenas as are used, allowing one subpoena to every four witnesses. They also decided that no fee is taxable for the service of a paper, unless it is a paper requiring an answer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Wend. 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erwin-v-martin-nysupct-1829.