Erwin v. Kilpatrick
10 N.C. 456
Opinion
Ever since the case of Timms v. Potter, the question arising in this case has been considered at rest; and it would he attended with the most mischievous consequences again to draw it into controversy. It has now become a fixed rule of property, that the increase of slaves, born during the life of the legatee for life, belong to the ulterior legatee who is the absolute owner. The judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Erwin v. Kilpatrick, 10 N.C. 456 (N.C. 1825).
10 N.C. 456 (Erwin v. Kilpatrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.