Erwin v. Kilpatrick

10 N.C. 456
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 15, 1825·Published

Opinion

Taylor, Chief Justice.

Ever since the case of Timms v. Potter, the question arising in this case has been considered at rest; and it would he attended with the most mischievous consequences again to draw it into controversy. It has now become a fixed rule of property, that the increase of slaves, born during the life of the legatee for life, belong to the ulterior legatee who is the absolute owner. The judgment must be affirmed.

The rest of the Court concurring;

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erwin v. Kilpatrick, 10 N.C. 456 (N.C. 1825).

10 N.C. 456 (Erwin v. Kilpatrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.