Erwin v. Erwin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Erwin v. Erwin

167 So. 2d 258

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 2, 1964

DocketNo. 4555

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 167 So. 2d 258 (Erwin v. Erwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Erwin v. Erwin, 167 So. 2d 258 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMPLE, WALLACE, Associate Judge.

This cause is reversed and remanded solely on the question of the attorney fee allowed the wife’s attorney for the reasons set forth in the opinion of this court in the appeal of Lyle v. Lyle, 167 So.2d 256, filed this date. In other respects the decree of the chancellor is affirmed.

The motion by appellee for an award of attorney’s fee on appeal is denied.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

SMITH, C. J., and WHITE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMPLE, WALLACE, Associate Judge.

This cause is reversed and remanded solely on the question of the attorney fee allowed the wife’s attorney for the reasons set forth in the opinion of this court in the appeal of Lyle v. Lyle, 167 So.2d 256, filed this date. In other respects the decree of the chancellor is affirmed.

The motion by appellee for an award of attorney’s fee on appeal is denied.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

SMITH, C. J., and WHITE, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 So. 2d 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erwin-v-erwin-fladistctapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack