Ervolino v. Caputa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ervolino v. Caputa

11 A.D.2d 1048, 207 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7752

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 1048 (Ervolino v. Caputa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ervolino v. Caputa, 11 A.D.2d 1048, 207 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, the State Rent Administrator appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 29, 1960, which: (1) annulled his determination, made June 30, 1959, denying a protest with respect to an order of the Local Rent Administrator, dated April 14, 1959, denying an application for a certificate of eviction; and (2) directed the issuance of the certificate. Prior to the argument of the appeal, the tenant removed from the subject apartment. Order dated January 29, 1960 reversed, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Special Term with directions to dismiss it solely upon the ground that the issues have become moot. (Matter of Schrager v. Weaver, 8 A D 2d 724.) Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, the State Rent Administrator appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 29, 1960, which: (1) annulled his determination, made June 30, 1959, denying a protest with respect to an order of the Local Rent Administrator, dated April 14, 1959, denying an application for a certificate of eviction; and (2) directed the issuance of the certificate. Prior to the argument of the appeal, the tenant removed from the subject apartment. Order dated January 29, 1960 reversed, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Special Term with directions to dismiss it solely upon the ground that the issues have become moot. (Matter of Schrager v. Weaver, 8 A D 2d 724.) Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 1048, 207 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ervolino-v-caputa-nyappdiv-1960.