Ervolina v. La Framboise
This text of 177 A.D.2d 987 (Ervolina v. La Framboise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this personal injury action when her truck struck a horse that had escaped from a farm onto a public highway. The horse had been boarded at a farm owned by defendants Richard and Jenny Lega. The court correctly granted summary judgment to defendants Tiranno and Philippe and Elma La Framboise, the owners of the horse. The moving defendants showed that they had no knowledge that the Lega Farm was an unsafe location for boarding their horse and that the horse did not have a preexisting propensity to run away (see, Brown v Willard, 278 App Div 728, affd 303 NY 727; cf., Brophy v Columbia County Agric. Socy., 116 AD2d 873). Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in response to the moving defendants’ prima facie showing (see, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J.—Summary [988]*988Judgment.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 A.D.2d 987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ervolina-v-la-framboise-nyappdiv-1991.