Ervin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ervin v. State

333 S.W.3d 529, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 278, 2011 WL 796786

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 8, 2011·No. ED 94858·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Flynnolyn Ervin, alleging he received ineffective assistance of counsel, appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order (judgment) denying his motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial *530 court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Flynnolyn Ervin, alleging he received ineffective assistance of counsel, appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order (judgment) denying his motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial *530 court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Ervin v. State, 333 S.W.3d 529, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 278, 2011 WL 796786 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

333 S.W.3d 529 (Ervin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.