Ervin v. Shinseki

Veterans Claims

Ervin v. Shinseki

25 Vet. App. 178, 2012 WL 177853, 2012 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 99

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided January 23, 2012·No. No. 08-3287·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

It is ORDERED that this Court’s opinion, entered on March 9, 2011, 24 Vet.App. 318 (2011), is hereby corrected as follows:

In the final paragraph, under the heading “CONCLUSION,” amend the final sentence by replacing it with the following: “The Court SETS ASIDE the Board’s June 18, 2008, decision and REMANDS Mr. Ervin’s service-connection claim for a chronic acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD, for further development and readjudication consistent with this opinion.”

This order does not disturb the judgment and mandate of the Court’s March 9, 2011, opinion, which issued on March 31, 2011, and May 31, 2011, respectively.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

It is ORDERED that this Court’s opinion, entered on March 9, 2011, 24 Vet.App. 318 (2011), is hereby corrected as follows:

In the final paragraph, under the heading “CONCLUSION,” amend the final sentence by replacing it with the following: “The Court SETS ASIDE the Board’s June 18, 2008, decision and REMANDS Mr. Ervin’s service-connection claim for a chronic acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD, for further development and readjudication consistent with this opinion.”

This order does not disturb the judgment and mandate of the Court’s March 9, 2011, opinion, which issued on March 31, 2011, and May 31, 2011, respectively.

Ervin v. Shinseki, 25 Vet. App. 178, 2012 WL 177853, 2012 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 99 (Cal. 2012).

Pincite

25 Vet. App. 178 (Ervin v. Shinseki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related