Ervin v. Miami Retreat Foundation

77 So. 2d 787
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 1, 1955·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The questions attempted to be raised by appellant were foreclosed in the prior appearance of this cause, Miami Retreat Foundation v. Ervin, Fla., 66 So.2d 667. An examination of the original file in the reported case demonstrates that in the opinion filed, the word “appellees” was corrected to the singular by the striking out of the terminal “s”. By reason of a typographical error, however, the plural was perpetuated in the copy of the opinion which was released.

It follows that the order appealed from must be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

MATHEWS, C. J., and HOBSON, THOMAS and DREW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ervin v. Miami Retreat Foundation, 77 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 1955).

77 So. 2d 787 (Ervin v. Miami Retreat Foundation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miami Retreat Foundation v. Ervin
66 So. 2d 667 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)