Ervin v. Chappell

District Court, N.D. California·Decided May 4, 2024·No. 3:00-cv-01228·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CURTIS LEE ERVIN, Case No. 00-cv-01228-VC Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING DOCUMENT Vv. PRODUCTION RON DAVIS, et al., Defendants. The Alameda County District Attorney’s Office is ordered to make available to settlement counsel the jury selection files in all Alameda cases in which a death penalty sentence was handed down. See Flowers v. Mississippi, 588 U.S. 284, 302 (2019); see also Foster v. Chatman, 578 U.S. 488, 501 (2016). Settlement counsel is authorized to use the files in all cases in which they have been appointed, and settlement counsel is authorized to share the evidence with co-counsel in those cases. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 4, 2024 — VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ervin v. Chappell, (N.D. Cal. 2024).

Ervin v. Chappell (Ervin v. Chappell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foster v. Chatman
578 U.S. 488 (Supreme Court, 2016)
Flowers v. Mississippi
588 U.S. 284 (Supreme Court, 2019)