Ervin Newton Blume v. United States
This text of 251 F.2d 888 (Ervin Newton Blume v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
251 F.2d 888
102 U.S.App.D.C. 177
Ervin Newton BLUME, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 14113.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Jan. 16, 1958.
Decided Jan. 23, 1958.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; Burnita Shelton Matthews, Judge.
Mr. Alvin Gordon, Washington, D.C. (appointed by the District Court), for appellant.
Mr. Harry T. Alexander, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Lewis, Carroll and Joel D. Blackwell, Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and BASTIAN and BURGER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was indicted under what is known as the Miller Act, 62 Stat. 347, 22 D.C.Code (1951) 3501(a), and convicted of simple assault. We find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 F.2d 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ervin-newton-blume-v-united-states-cadc-1958.