Ervin, Ashley
This text of Ervin, Ashley (Ervin, Ashley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-88,430-01
EX PARTE ASHLEY ERVIN, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1074292-A IN THE 208TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam. Newell, J., not participating.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). A jury convicted Applicant of capital murder.
The State did not seek the death penalty, and the trial court imposed an automatic sentence of life
without parole. TEX . PENAL CODE § 12.31 (eff. 09/01/2005 to 08/31/2009). The First Court of
Appeals affirmed the conviction. Ervin v. State, No.333 S.W.3d 187 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st
Dist.] 2010).
Applicant contends that her sentence in this cause is unconstitutional because she was under 2
eighteen years of age at the time she committed the offense. The trial court has entered findings of
fact confirming that Applicant was under the age of eighteen at the time she committed the capital
murder.
In Miller v. Alabama, 132 S.Ct. 2455 (2012), the Supreme Court held that a mandatory “life
without parole” sentence for a defendant who was under the age of eighteen at the time of the crime
violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. In Ex parte Maxwell,
424 S.W.3d 66 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014), this Court held that Miller would be applied retroactively.
The trial court, with the State’s agreement, recommends that relief be granted. The findings
and recommendation are supported by the habeas record. The sentence in Cause No. 1074292 in the
208th District Court of Harris County is vacated, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the
Sheriff of Harris County for further sentencing proceedings in accordance with Ex parte Maxwell,
supra. The fact finder, after consideration of Applicant’s individual conduct, circumstances, and
character, shall be permitted to assess Applicant’s sentence at life with the possibility of parole or
life without parole. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the
mandate of this Court issues.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Delivered: June 20, 2018 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ervin, Ashley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ervin-ashley-texcrimapp-2018.