Erum v. Llego

Hawaii Supreme Court

Erum v. Llego

DecidedOctober 3, 2019

DocketSCWC-17-0000762

StatusPublished

This text of Erum v. Llego (Erum v. Llego) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Erum v. Llego, (haw 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 03-OCT-2019 SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 02:34 PM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

THEODORICO ERUM, JR., Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

JOSUE BUMATAY LLEGO, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIV. NO. 14-1-0199)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Theodorico Erum Jr.’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on August 28, 2019, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 3, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 03-OCT-2019 SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 02:34 PM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

THEODORICO ERUM, JR., Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

JOSUE BUMATAY LLEGO, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIV. NO. 14-1-0199)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Theodorico Erum Jr.’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on August 28, 2019, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 3, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Erum v. Llego, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erum-v-llego-haw-2019.