Erum v. Llego

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Erum v. Llego. Read the opinion of the Court — 465 P.3d 815
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 3, 2019·No. SCWC-17-0000762·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 03-OCT-2019

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 02:34 PM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

THEODORICO ERUM, JR.,

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

JOSUE BUMATAY LLEGO,

Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIV. NO. 14-1-0199)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Theodorico Erum Jr.’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on August 28, 2019, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 3, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erum v. Llego, (haw 2019).

Erum v. Llego (Erum v. Llego) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.