Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Erts v. E.A.T. Co-Op

Erts v. E.A.T. Co-Op

261 A.D.2d 570, 688 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5680
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 24, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D.2d 570 (Erts v. E.A.T. Co-Op) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erts v. E.A.T. Co-Op, 261 A.D.2d 570, 688 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), dated April 20, 1998, which, upon a jury verdict, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court’s refusal to charge the jury that the defendants’ purported violation of certain municipal ordinances could be considered as some evidence of negligence was proper [571]*571under the facts of this case (cf., De Yorio v Jamer, 40 AD2d 861). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Yorio v. Jamer
40 A.D.2d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D.2d 570, 688 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erts-v-eat-co-op-nyappdiv-1999.