Ertle v. Placer County

44 P. 229, 5 Cal. Unrep. 302, 1896 Cal. LEXIS 1086
California Supreme Court·Decided March 18, 1896·No. Sac. No. 69·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the superior court, made after final judgment, denying defendants’ motion to strike out plaintiff’s cost bill, amounting to only $65.45. The only ground of the motion was that the memorandum of the items of costs, though properly verified and filed with the clerk, was not served on the defendants within the time prescribed by section 1033 of the Code of Civil Procedure. As the whole amount of costs claimed by plaintiff was less than $300, this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal: Fairbanks v. Lampkin, 99 Cal. 429, 34 Pac. 101. Therefore the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ertle v. Placer County, 44 P. 229, 5 Cal. Unrep. 302, 1896 Cal. LEXIS 1086 (Cal. 1896).

44 P. 229 (Ertle v. Placer County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fairbanks v. Lampkin
34 P. 101 (California Supreme Court, 1893)