Ertl v. Hodel

663 F. Supp. 1126, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6717
CourtDistrict Court, D. Colorado
DecidedJuly 23, 1987
DocketCiv. A. No. 86 F 764
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 663 F. Supp. 1126 (Ertl v. Hodel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ertl v. Hodel, 663 F. Supp. 1126, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6717 (D. Colo. 1987).

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

SHERMAN G. FINESILVER, Chief Judge.

This case involves claims and patents to oil shale deposits in Colorado. The legal principles underlying this litigation involve application of Tosco Corp. v. Hodel, 611 F.Supp. 1130 (D.Colo.1985).

On March 6, 1987, before this case was at issue, the principal parties moved the Court to dismiss this complaint.

ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this complaint and cause of action be DISMISSED, each party to pay it or their own costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marathon Oil Co. v. Lujan
751 F. Supp. 1454 (D. Colorado, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
663 F. Supp. 1126, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ertl-v-hodel-cod-1987.