Ertl v. Hodel
663 F. Supp. 1126, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6717
District Court, D. Colorado·Decided July 23, 1987·No. Civ. A. No. 86 F 764·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
This case involves claims and patents to oil shale deposits in Colorado. The legal principles underlying this litigation involve application of Tosco Corp. v. Hodel, 611 F.Supp. 1130 (D.Colo.1985).
On March 6, 1987, before this case was at issue, the principal parties moved the Court to dismiss this complaint.
ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this complaint and cause of action be DISMISSED, each party to pay it or their own costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ertl v. Hodel, 663 F. Supp. 1126, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6717 (D. Colo. 1987).
663 F. Supp. 1126 (Ertl v. Hodel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marathon Oil Co. v. Lujan
751 F. Supp. 1454 (D. Colorado, 1990)