Erskine v. United States

Customs and Patent Appeals

Erskine v. United States

14 Ct. Cust. 172, 1926 WL 27826, 1926 CCPA LEXIS 307

CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals

DecidedMay 29, 1926

DocketNo. 2562

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Ct. Cust. 172 (Erskine v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Erskine v. United States, 14 Ct. Cust. 172, 1926 WL 27826, 1926 CCPA LEXIS 307 (ccpa 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The record in th i case does not disclose that the entry was liquidated and both parties concede that it was not liquidated. Upon the authority of Woolworth et al. v. United States, 14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 81, T. D. 41583, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice io the right of the importer to file another petition for the remission of additional duties or to avail himself of such other legal remedy as may be proper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The record in th i case does not disclose that the entry was liquidated and both parties concede that it was not liquidated. Upon the authority of Woolworth et al. v. United States, 14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 81, T. D. 41583, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice io the right of the importer to file another petition for the remission of additional duties or to avail himself of such other legal remedy as may be proper.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Ct. Cust. 172, 1926 WL 27826, 1926 CCPA LEXIS 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erskine-v-united-states-ccpa-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack