Erskine v. United States

14 Ct. Cust. 172, 1926 WL 27826, 1926 CCPA LEXIS 307
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·Decided May 29, 1926·No. No. 2562·Published

Opinion

Smith, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The record in th i case does not disclose that the entry was liquidated and both parties concede that it was not liquidated. Upon the authority of Woolworth et al. v. United States, 14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 81, T. D. 41583, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice io the right of the importer to file another petition for the remission of additional duties or to avail himself of such other legal remedy as may be proper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erskine v. United States, 14 Ct. Cust. 172, 1926 WL 27826, 1926 CCPA LEXIS 307 (ccpa 1926).

14 Ct. Cust. 172 (Erskine v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woolworth Co. v. United States
14 Ct. Cust. 81 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)