Erskine v. Division of Highways

25 Ct. Cl. 149
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedJune 10, 2004
DocketCC-03-057
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Ct. Cl. 149 (Erskine v. Division of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Erskine v. Division of Highways, 25 Ct. Cl. 149 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted to the Court for decision upon a Stipulation entered into by claimant and respondent wherein certain facts and circumstances of the claim were agreed to as follows:

1. On February 17,2003, claimant was traveling across the Amandaville Bridge on Route 60 in St. Albans, Kanawha County, when her vehicle struck a hole in the road damaging a tire.

2. Respondent was responsible for the maintenance of the Amandaville bridge on Route 60 in Kanawha County and respondent failed to maintain properly Route 60 on the date of this incident.

3. As a result of this incident, claimant’s vehicle sustained damage in the amount of $79.45.

[150]*1504. Respondent agrees that the amount of $79.45 for the damages as put forth by the claimant is fair and reasonable.

The Court has reviewed the facts of the claim and finds that respondent was negligent in its maintenance of the Amandaville Bridge on Route 60 in Kanawha County on the date of this incident; that the negligence of respondent was the proximate cause of the damages sustained to claimant’s vehicle; and that the amount of the damages agreed to by the parties is fair and reasonable. Thus, claimant may make a recovery for her loss.

Accordingly, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award in the amount of $79.45.

Award of $79.45.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Ct. Cl. 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/erskine-v-division-of-highways-wvctcl-2004.