Errol Lynch v. Joseph S. Cannatella, Jr.
860 F.2d 651, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16003, 1988 WL 118679
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 28, 1988·No. 87-3501·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the district court opinion, 1 the judgment is AFFIRMED. While the appeal has no arguable merit, we take into account counsel’s confessed inexperience and asserted good faith and therefore DENY the motion to impose sanctions.
1
. F.R.D.-(E.D.La.1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Errol Lynch v. Joseph S. Cannatella, Jr., 860 F.2d 651, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16003, 1988 WL 118679 (5th Cir. 1988).
860 F.2d 651 (Errol Lynch v. Joseph S. Cannatella, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mertes v. Internal Revenue Service
E.D. California, 2021