Errol Lynch v. Joseph S. Cannatella, Jr.

860 F.2d 651, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16003, 1988 WL 118679
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 1988
Docket87-3501
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 860 F.2d 651 (Errol Lynch v. Joseph S. Cannatella, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Errol Lynch v. Joseph S. Cannatella, Jr., 860 F.2d 651, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16003, 1988 WL 118679 (5th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: .

For the reasons stated in the district court opinion, 1 the judgment is AFFIRMED. While the appeal has no arguable merit, we take into account counsel’s confessed inexperience and asserted good faith and therefore DENY the motion to impose sanctions.

1

. F.R.D.-(E.D.La.1988).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
860 F.2d 651, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16003, 1988 WL 118679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/errol-lynch-v-joseph-s-cannatella-jr-ca5-1988.