Erreca v. Los Banos Cotton Gins, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Erreca v. Los Banos Cotton Gins, Inc.

96 Cal. App. 783

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 22, 1929

DocketCiv. No. 3221

StatusPublished

This text of 96 Cal. App. 783 (Erreca v. Los Banos Cotton Gins, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Erreca v. Los Banos Cotton Gins, Inc., 96 Cal. App. 783 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The defendant appeals from the order denying its motion to vacate the judgment rendered against it in favor of the plaintiff on the seventeenth day of June, [784]*7841926, and also appeals from an order refusing to grant its motion for a new trial.

By the provisions of section 963- of the Code of Civil Procedure, no appeal lies from the denial of a motion for new trial.

The facts disclosed hy the record in this case are identical with the facts which appear in the record in the case of Startzman v. Los Banos Cotton Gins, Inc., 82 Cal. App. 624 [256 Pac. 220]. In that case the order of the trial court refusing to set aside the judgment was affirmed.

Upon the authority of the case just referred to it follows that the order denying the motion to set aside the judgment-in the action must be affirmed, and it. is so ordered. The appeal from the order refusing to grant a new trial is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI