Eros Corp. of Daytona Beach, Inc. v. Burgoyne Properties, Ltd.

946 So. 2d 1245, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 824, 2007 WL 173908
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 25, 2007·No. No. 1D06-5265·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Bouchard v. State, Dep’t of Bus. Reg., 448 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (holding that the five additional days to perform an act required to be done after service of a document by mail allowed by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420 does not apply to the filing of the notice of appeal).

DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., ERVIN, III, RICHARD W., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eros Corp. of Daytona Beach, Inc. v. Burgoyne Properties, Ltd., 946 So. 2d 1245, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 824, 2007 WL 173908 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

946 So. 2d 1245 (Eros Corp. of Daytona Beach, Inc. v. Burgoyne Properties, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bouchard v. STATE, DEPT. OF BUS. REGULATION
448 So. 2d 1126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)