Ernst & Young v. Morris
137 S. Ct. 909, 197 L. Ed. 2d 82, 85 U.S.L.W. 3362, 2017 WL 125665, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 911
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 25, 2017
DocketNo. 16–300.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 137 S. Ct. 909 (Ernst & Young v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ernst & Young v. Morris, 137 S. Ct. 909, 197 L. Ed. 2d 82, 85 U.S.L.W. 3362, 2017 WL 125665, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 911 (U.S. 2017).
Opinion
The following briefing schedule is adopted:
Petitioner in Nos. 16-285 and 16-300 and respondent in No. 16-307 will file opening and reply briefs under the schedule set forth in Rules 25.1 and 25.3. Respondent in Nos. 16-285 and 16-300 and petitioner in No. 16-307 will file response briefs under the schedule set forth in Rule 25.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Shakoor v. VXI Global Solutions, Inc.
2017 Ohio 8018 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2017)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
137 S. Ct. 909, 197 L. Ed. 2d 82, 85 U.S.L.W. 3362, 2017 WL 125665, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernst-young-v-morris-scotus-2017.