Ernst Vs. Ernst

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: March 26, 2020
• Docket: 80743
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CHARLES ERNST, No. 80743 Appellant, vs. ROSEMARY ERNST, 71,1 p Respondent.

MAR ?.s.0 . ..., :...1.ASRT , %.....--- _ DEPuffa;7—

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order for judgment regarding community waste and an order denying appellant's motion to recuse the district court judge. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the orders designated in the notice of appeal are not substantively appealable. See NEAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an interlocutory order addressing community waste or from an order denying a motion to recuse a judge. See Jones v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 130 Nev. 493, 497, 330 P.3d 475, 478 (2014);

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

7e0 ( (0) 1947A 41114. Peck v. Crouser, 129 Nev. 120, 124, 295 P.3d 586, 588 (2013). This court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

cc: Hon. T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., District Judge, Family Court Division Charles Ernst Fine Carman Price Eighth District Court Clerk

(0) 1947A AN. 2