Ernie Ball, Inc. v. Earvana, LLC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ernie Ball, Inc. v. Earvana, LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 502 F. App'x 971
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 17, 2012·No. 2012-1276·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Um'ted States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

ERNIE BALL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

V.

EARVANA, LLC, Defendant-Appellant.

2012-1276

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in case no. 06-CV-0384, Judge Jacque1ine H. Nguyen.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Earvana, LLC ("Earvana") moves unopposed for an extension of time until August 24, 2012 to file its reply brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

(1) Earvana’s motion for an extension of time until August 24, 2012, to Hle its reply brief is granted

ERNIE BALL, INC. V. EARVANA, LLC 2

(2) Earvana’s motion for an extension of time until August 13, 2012, to file its reply brief is denied as moot.

FoR THE CoURT

AUG 1 7 2012 d Date

/s/ J an Horbaly J an Horbaly

Clerk cc: G. Henry Welles, Esq. Christian E. Iversen, Esq.

s25

.,.a¢¢uafl'e§?¢»wpoa

msl=enenALcxncul'r AUG 1 721]12

JAN HORBALY ' CI.ERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ernie Ball, Inc. v. Earvana, LLC, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Ernie Ball, Inc. v. Earvana, LLC (Ernie Ball, Inc. v. Earvana, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.