Ernesto Santiago-Robles v. State
This text of Ernesto Santiago-Robles v. State (Ernesto Santiago-Robles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
ERNESTO SANTIAGO-ROBLES,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D15-4223
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed June 24, 2016
3.853 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Wayne C. Wooten, Judge.
Ernesto Santiago-Robles, Clermont, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a facially sufficient, good faith motion.
PALMER, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ernesto Santiago-Robles v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernesto-santiago-robles-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.