Ernesto Santiago-Robles v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 20, 2016
Docket5D15-4223
StatusPublished

This text of Ernesto Santiago-Robles v. State (Ernesto Santiago-Robles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ernesto Santiago-Robles v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ERNESTO SANTIAGO-ROBLES,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D15-4223

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed June 24, 2016

3.853 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Wayne C. Wooten, Judge.

Ernesto Santiago-Robles, Clermont, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a facially sufficient, good faith motion.

PALMER, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ernesto Santiago-Robles v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernesto-santiago-robles-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.