Ernesto LaFrienza v. State
This text of Ernesto LaFrienza v. State (Ernesto LaFrienza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
ERNESTO LAFRIENZA, § No. 08-13-00121-CR Appellant, § Appeal from the V. § 34th District Court THE STATE OF TEXAS, § of El Paso County, Texas Appellee § (TC# 20120D03040)
JUDGMENT
The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the judgment of
conviction should be reformed to reflect: (1) the use of a deadly weapon as to each count; (2) the
jury assessed fifty years’ and a fine of $5,000.00 as to each count; (3) that the trial court
pronounced Counts I and II are to run concurrent; (4) that Appellant pled not guilty as to each
count; (5) that Appellant pled not true to the two alleged prior felony convictions as to each
count; and (6) that the jury found true to Appellant’s two prior felony convictions as to each
count. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court as reformed. This decision shall be
certified below for observance.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2015.
YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice
Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ernesto LaFrienza v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernesto-lafrienza-v-state-texcrimapp-2015.