ERNESTO HERRADA-CORDOVA v. State
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed November 25, 2020.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D20-1184
Lower Tribunal No. 14-20090
Ernesto Herrada-Cordova,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge.
Ernesto Herrada-Cordova, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Ernesto Herrada-Cordova, the defendant below, appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The order entered by the trial court denying such relief examines the legal standard and factual predicate, citing to the trial transcript, affidavits, and other court records, including the appellant’s confession presented to the jury. However, the summary record before us on appeal contains none of the documents so referenced in the order. Accordingly, we are constrained to reverse the order of denial and remand for an evidentiary hearing or for the attachment of record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ERNESTO HERRADA-CORDOVA v. State (ERNESTO HERRADA-CORDOVA v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.