ERNESTO HERRADA-CORDOVA v. State
This text of ERNESTO HERRADA-CORDOVA v. State (ERNESTO HERRADA-CORDOVA v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed November 25, 2020. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1184 Lower Tribunal No. 14-20090 ________________
Ernesto Herrada-Cordova, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge.
Ernesto Herrada-Cordova, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Ernesto Herrada-Cordova, the defendant below, appeals the trial court’s
denial of his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal
Procedure 3.850. The order entered by the trial court denying such relief examines
the legal standard and factual predicate, citing to the trial transcript, affidavits, and
other court records, including the appellant’s confession presented to the jury.
However, the summary record before us on appeal contains none of the documents
so referenced in the order. Accordingly, we are constrained to reverse the order of
denial and remand for an evidentiary hearing or for the attachment of record excerpts
conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief. See Fla. R. App.
P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ERNESTO HERRADA-CORDOVA v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernesto-herrada-cordova-v-state-fladistctapp-2020.