Ernesto Berlanga v. State
This text of Ernesto Berlanga v. State (Ernesto Berlanga v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-13-00082-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
ERNESTO BERLANGA, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
This cause is before the Court on appellant’s “Motion to Proceed with Appeal Out
of Time.” Appellant, Ernesto Berlanga, was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in
prison. Sentence in this matter was imposed on September 1, 2011. A motion for new
trial was not filed, therefore Berlanga’s notice of appeal was due on or before October 3, 2011 1 . See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1 (a), 26.2(a). Berlanga’s appeal was not filed until
January 23, 2009. Because the original notice of appeal was not filed timely, this Court
lacked jurisdiction to consider the appeal and dismissed it for want of jurisdiction on
October 18, 2012. See Berlanga v. State of Texas, No. 13-12-00270-CR, 2012 Tex.
App. LEXIS 8751 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Oct. 18, 2012, no pet.) (per curiam mem.
op.).
On January 7, 2013, appellant filed another notice of appeal from the murder
conviction. Appellant’s motion requests that he be allowed to proceed with his appeal.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure require a notice of appeal “must be given
in writing and filed with the trial court clerk.” Tex.R.App. P. 25.2(c)(1). Unless a motion
for new trial has been timely filed, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after
the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after the day the trial court
enters an appealable order. See id. 26.2(a)(1). Where a timely motion for new trial has
been filed, the notice of appeal must be filed within ninety days after the day sentence is
imposed or suspended in open court. See id. 26.2(a)(2). The time within which to file
the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice, the
party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. 26.3.
Appellant=s second notice of appeal, filed more than fifteen months after sentence
was imposed, was untimely, and accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. See
1 Because the thirtieth day fell on a Saturday, appellant had until the following Monday, October 3, 2011 to file the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1. 2 Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Accordingly, appellant’s
“Motion to Proceed with Appeal Out of Time” is DENIED.
Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ of
habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the
availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM.
PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, ' 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240
(Tex. Crim. App. 1999).
The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 21st day of March, 2013.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ernesto Berlanga v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernesto-berlanga-v-state-texapp-2013.