Ernesto Alvarez v. State
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00486-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
ERNESTO ALVAREZ, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Ernesto Alvarez, attempts to appeal his conviction for assault. The trial
court has certified that this Ais a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of
appeal.@ See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). On August 11 2011, this Court notified appellant=s counsel of the trial court=s
certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether
appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel=s findings
as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the
existence of any amended certification.
On December 1, 2011, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel=s
response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is
incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be
dismissed if the trial court=s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of
appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this
appeal is DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 15th day of December, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ernesto Alvarez v. State (Ernesto Alvarez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.