Ernest Williams v. State
This text of Ernest Williams v. State (Ernest Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 18, 2018
NO. 03-18-00267-CR
Ernest Williams, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s
judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction.
Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to reflect that appellant was convicted of
a third-degree felony. The judgment, as modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and
unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ernest Williams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-williams-v-state-texapp-2018.