Ernest v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ernest v. State

201 S.W.3d 70, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1328, 2006 WL 2597954

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 12, 2006

DocketNo. ED 86809

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 201 S.W.3d 70 (Ernest v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ernest v. State, 201 S.W.3d 70, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1328, 2006 WL 2597954 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sir Peter Ernest appeals the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035. The court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sir Peter Ernest appeals the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035. The court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 S.W.3d 70, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1328, 2006 WL 2597954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-v-state-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack