Ernest v. . City of Schenectady
85 N.E. 1110, 191 N.Y. 553, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 1186
This text of 85 N.E. 1110 (Ernest v. . City of Schenectady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ernest v. . City of Schenectady, 85 N.E. 1110, 191 N.Y. 553, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 1186 (N.Y. 1908).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Cullen, Ch. J., and Haight, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
85 N.E. 1110, 191 N.Y. 553, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 1186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-v-city-of-schenectady-ny-1908.