Ernest Tyrone Howard v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 2, 2016·No. 14-15-00735-CR·Published

Opinion

Motions granted; Order filed August 2, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-15-00735-CR ____________

ERNEST TYRONE HOWARD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1408632

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has filed two motions to access the appellate record, making known to this Court his desire to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). His motions are granted. Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 178th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before August 17, 2016; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ernest Tyrone Howard v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Ernest Tyrone Howard v. State (Ernest Tyrone Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)