Ernest Reed v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 20, 2016
Docket16-0578
StatusPublished

This text of Ernest Reed v. State of Florida (Ernest Reed v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ernest Reed v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

ERNEST REED, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D16-0578

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed March 11, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Ernest Reed, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as premature.

THOMAS, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ernest Reed v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-reed-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.