Ernest Perez v. State
This text of Ernest Perez v. State (Ernest Perez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 27, 2016
NO. 03-15-00490-CR
Ernest Perez, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.
Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-15-00491-CR
APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.
Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ernest Perez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-perez-v-state-texapp-2016.