Ernest Nelson v. United States

384 F.2d 390
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 24, 1967
Docket24365_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 384 F.2d 390 (Ernest Nelson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ernest Nelson v. United States, 384 F.2d 390 (5th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ernest Nelson (appellant) was convicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida of knowingly and unlawfully purchasing narcotic drugs in a package other than the originally stamped package in violation of Title 26 U.S.C. § 4704(a). The case was tried before the judge, jury trial having been waived by stipulation of the parties. The sentence was set by the court at nine years.

Appellant argues that ■ the court erred in denying his motion to suppress in that he was not arrested upon probable cause and thus the seizure from his person of a package containing opiates which was later admitted into evidence constituted a search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. Under the facts and circumstances in this case, we find that the district court was fully justified in finding that the officers did have probable cause and reasonable grounds for arrest, and that the search and seizure made incident to the arrest were valid.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolff v. Wells Fargo Bank
618 F.2d 76 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
In Re Moralez
618 F.2d 76 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
384 F.2d 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-nelson-v-united-states-ca5-1967.