Ernest Munger v. United States

Eighth Circuit

Ernest Munger v. United States

230 F.2d 954

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 21, 1956

Docket15480

StatusPublished

This text of 230 F.2d 954 (Ernest Munger v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ernest Munger v. United States, 230 F.2d 954 (8th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

230 F.2d 954

Ernest MUNGER, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 15480.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Feb. 21, 1956.

John C. Farrar, Rapid City, S.D., for appellant.

Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Roger P. Marquis, Chief, Appellate Section, Lands Division, Dept. of Justice, Reginald W. Barnes, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., and Clinton G. Richards, U.S. Atty., Sioux Falls, S.D., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, on motion of appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

230 F.2d 954

Ernest MUNGER, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 15480.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Feb. 21, 1956.

John C. Farrar, Rapid City, S.D., for appellant.

Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Roger P. Marquis, Chief, Appellate Section, Lands Division, Dept. of Justice, Reginald W. Barnes, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., and Clinton G. Richards, U.S. Atty., Sioux Falls, S.D., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, on motion of appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 F.2d 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-munger-v-united-states-ca8-1956.