Ernest Leroy Burgess v. Laurie F. Bessinger Terrill Cannon, Officer Stephen Gomori, Officer

Fourth Circuit

Ernest Leroy Burgess v. Laurie F. Bessinger Terrill Cannon, Officer Stephen Gomori, Officer

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11006, 1995 WL 95840

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 9, 1995

Docket94-7051

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1215 (Ernest Leroy Burgess v. Laurie F. Bessinger Terrill Cannon, Officer Stephen Gomori, Officer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ernest Leroy Burgess v. Laurie F. Bessinger Terrill Cannon, Officer Stephen Gomori, Officer, 48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11006, 1995 WL 95840 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ernest Leroy BURGESS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Laurie F. BESSINGER; Terrill Cannon, Officer; Stephen
Gomori, Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7051.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 9, 1995.

Ernest Leroy Burgess, appellant pro se.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying him in forma pauperis status. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. Burgess v. Bessinger, No. CA-94-129 (D.S.C. Aug. 17, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ernest Leroy BURGESS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Laurie F. BESSINGER; Terrill Cannon, Officer; Stephen
Gomori, Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7051.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 9, 1995.

Ernest Leroy Burgess, appellant pro se.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying him in forma pauperis status. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. Burgess v. Bessinger, No. CA-94-129 (D.S.C. Aug. 17, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11006, 1995 WL 95840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-leroy-burgess-v-laurie-f-bessinger-terrill--ca4-1995.