Ernest L. Levine v. United States of America

Seventh Circuit

Ernest L. Levine v. United States of America

56 F.3d 34, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14294, 1995 WL 349127

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided June 7, 1995·No. 93-3183·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of Ernest Levine’s motion to vacate judgment, we conclude that Levine submitted a well-pleaded complaint before the district court under the Tucker Act. Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp., 486 U.S. 800, 108 S.Ct. 2166, 100 L.Ed.2d 811 (1988). We therefore VACATE our judgment for lack of appellate jurisdiction and TRANSFER the appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1295.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of Ernest Levine’s motion to vacate judgment, we conclude that Levine submitted a well-pleaded complaint before the district court under the Tucker Act. Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp., 486 U.S. 800, 108 S.Ct. 2166, 100 L.Ed.2d 811 (1988). We therefore VACATE our judgment for lack of appellate jurisdiction and TRANSFER the appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1295.

Ernest L. Levine v. United States of America, 56 F.3d 34, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14294, 1995 WL 349127 (7th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

56 F.3d 34 (Ernest L. Levine v. United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related