Ernest Kramme v. Safelite Group

280 F. App'x 567
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 11, 2008·No. 07-1247·Unpublished

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Ernest Kramme appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his claims brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. After reviewing the record de novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from in a light most favorable to Kramme, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ernest Kramme v. Safelite Group, 280 F. App'x 567 (8th Cir. 2008).

280 F. App'x 567 (Ernest Kramme v. Safelite Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related