Ernest Kramme v. Safelite Group

Eighth Circuit

Ernest Kramme v. Safelite Group

280 F. App'x 567

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJune 11, 2008

Docket07-1247

StatusUnpublished

This text of 280 F. App'x 567 (Ernest Kramme v. Safelite Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ernest Kramme v. Safelite Group, 280 F. App'x 567 (8th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Ernest Kramme appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his claims brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. After reviewing the record de novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from in a light most favorable to Kramme, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Ernest Kramme appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his claims brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. After reviewing the record de novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from in a light most favorable to Kramme, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 F. App'x 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-kramme-v-safelite-group-ca8-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack