Ernest K. Bramblett v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Ernest K. Bramblett v. United States

272 F.2d 710

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 3, 1959

Docket16452

StatusPublished

This text of 272 F.2d 710 (Ernest K. Bramblett v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ernest K. Bramblett v. United States, 272 F.2d 710 (9th Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

272 F.2d 710

Ernest K. BRAMBLETT, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 16452.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

December 3, 1959.

Ernest King Bramblett, in pro. per.

Laughlin E. Waters, U. S. Atty., Richard A. Lavine, James R. Dooley, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before STEPHENS, BARNES and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment in the above entitled case is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

272 F.2d 710

Ernest K. BRAMBLETT, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 16452.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

December 3, 1959.

Ernest King Bramblett, in pro. per.

Laughlin E. Waters, U. S. Atty., Richard A. Lavine, James R. Dooley, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before STEPHENS, BARNES and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment in the above entitled case is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 F.2d 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-k-bramblett-v-united-states-ca9-1959.