Ernest K. Bankas v. Maureen Bankas
This text of Ernest K. Bankas v. Maureen Bankas (Ernest K. Bankas v. Maureen Bankas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered April 23, 2015
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00388-CV
ERNEST K. BANKAS, Appellant
V.
MAUREEN BANKAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-09-13471
ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s April 20, 2015 “Plea for an Extension.” Because
appellant’s brief is attached to this document, we treat it as a motion for an extension of time to
file a brief. Because the clerk’s record has not yet been filed, we DENY appellant’s motion as
premature.
The clerk’s record is past due. Appellant has filed an affidavit of indigence. A hearing
on the contest to the affidavit is scheduled for April 23, 2015. We ORDER Felicia Pitre to file
by APRIL 29, 2015, a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order on the
contest. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic
transmission to the Honorable Mary Brown, Judge of the 301st Judicial District Court, Felicia
Pitre, counsel for appellee, and by first-class mail to appellant.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ernest K. Bankas v. Maureen Bankas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ernest-k-bankas-v-maureen-bankas-texapp-2015.